Recipes and expert knowledge
Recipe
EditRCP-0053android-aso-google-playGrowthv0.1.0PendingA repeatable Google Play App Store Optimization play that builds a listing draft engineered for how Google actually ranks (indexed full description, semantic matching, no hidden keyword field). It confirms inputs, pulls Play-specific keyword data, drafts the listing at exact character limits, audits the existing listing across six factors (/60), briefs a feature graphic, and proposes a disciplined one-element Play Store Experiments plan before founder sign-off.
Classification
Use Cases
Primary use case
My Google Play listing is either not written yet or was never optimized for Play's algorithm -- I need a listing draft built for how Google actually ranks (indexed full description, no hidden keyword field, semantic matching), not a copy of my iOS metadata.
An optimized Play listing draft at exact limits -- title (30 chars), short description (80 chars), and an indexed full description (4000 chars) with the primary keyword in the first 167 characters and 3-5 times overall -- plus a 6-factor audit scorecard (/60) of the existing listing, a feature graphic brief, and a one-element Play Store Experiments plan.
| Signal | Role | Direction | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall listing audit score (0-60) | North star | ↑ | >= 42 after the first remediation cycle |
| Audit factors still scoring <= 6 | Leading | ↓ | - |
| Organic Play Store downloads | Lagging | ↑ | - |
| Listing fields exceeding character limits | Guardrail | ↓ | 0 |
My Android downloads underperform iOS and I suspect the Play listing is the reason, but I don't know which part -- the title, the short description, the full description, the graphics, or the ratings.
A factor-level diagnosis: six listing factors scored 1-10 with notes, the top 3 improvements ranked, and a redrafted listing that re-researches keywords for Play instead of translating the iOS metadata.
| Signal | Role | Direction | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Play Store downloads | North star | ↑ | - |
| Title / short description / full description factor scores | Leading | ↑ | - |
| Android-to-iOS organic download ratio | Lagging | ↑ | - |
| Title primary keyword repeated in the short description | Guardrail | ↓ | 0 |
I want to stop guessing which listing changes work -- I need a disciplined Play Store Experiments plan that tells me what to test first and how long to run it.
A Play Store Experiments plan testing exactly one element (icon, feature graphic, screenshots, short description, or full description) with up to 3 variants, an explicit hypothesis tied to the lowest-scoring audit factors, and a minimum run length of 7 days or 1,000 impressions per variant.
| Signal | Role | Direction | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Store listing conversion rate | North star | ↑ | - |
| Experiments run to completion | Leading | ↑ | - |
| Organic Play Store downloads | Lagging | ↑ | - |
| Elements tested per experiment | Guardrail | ↓ | 1 |
Prerequisites
The Google Play package name is known
An app marketing context document describing the product, category, and target users
The current title (30 chars) and short description (80 chars), from Play Console or the founder
The founder's top 3 important keywords
The app's Google Play category
Play Console access is helpful but optional (otherwise substitute app-intelligence data plus the public Play Store page)
Workflow
Confirm the listing inputs, pull Play-specific keyword data, draft the optimized listing at exact character limits, audit the existing listing on six factors, brief the feature graphic, propose a one-element Play Store Experiments plan, then have the founder review and accept the package.
Founder confirms the listing inputs: package name, Play Console access (yes/no), current title (30 chars), current short description (80 chars), top 3 important keywords, and category (country defaults to US).
HumanConfirmed listing inputs and scope.Pull Play-specific keyword data for the top 3 keywords in the target country: search volume and difficulty per keyword, long-tail variants, and semantic synonyms.
ToolKeyword metrics, long-tail variants, and semantic synonyms.Draft the optimized Play listing: title (30 chars), short description (80 chars), and indexed full description (4000 chars) structured as hook, feature bullets, social proof, call to action, and keyword-rich closing, with the primary keyword in the first 167 characters and 3-5 times overall, plus the list of keywords targeted.
Agent# Role
You are a senior ASO (App Store Optimization) copywriter specializing
in Google Play. You draft complete Play Store listings optimized for
Google's algorithm: the full description IS indexed, there is no
hidden keyword field, and matching is semantic (synonyms and
long-tail variants count).
# Core rules
- Work only from the supplied data (keyword metrics, marketing
context, current listing). Never fabricate search volumes,
rankings, ratings, awards, or press mentions.
- Hard character limits: title 30, short description 80, full
description 4000. Count characters and never exceed them.
- Write for humans first; keywords must read naturally.
# Title (30 characters)
- Pattern: Brand -- Keyword Descriptor.
- Include exactly 1 high-volume keyword, naturally.
- Example shape: "Headspace: Meditation & Sleep".
# Short description (80 characters)
- This is the first thing users read on search results.
- Work the 2-3 most important keywords naturally into one compelling
sentence.
- Do NOT repeat the title's primary keyword.
# Full description (4000 characters, indexed)
Structure, in order:
1. Hook paragraph -- primary keyword within the first 167 characters
(the above-the-fold preview).
2. 5-8 feature bullets -- "Feature: Benefit" form, using keyword
variants; no exact-phrase repetition.
3. Social proof -- trust signals, awards, press (only what the
supplied context supports).
4. Call to action -- "Download {App} today -- {value prop}".
5. Closing keyword-rich paragraph -- semantic synonyms and long-tail
variants.
# Keyword density
The primary keyword appears 3-5 times total across the full
description, never stuffed. Vary phrasing with the collected synonyms
instead of repeating the exact phrase.
# Output
Draft title, short description, and full description, each with its
character count shown, followed by the list of keywords targeted.
Optimized listing draft with keywords targeted.Score the existing listing on six factors -- title, short description, full description, screenshots, feature graphic, ratings -- each 1-10 with a note, compute the overall score (/60), and rank the top 3 improvements. Skip for pre-launch apps.
Agent# Role You are a senior ASO specialist auditing an existing Google Play listing. You produce an honest, numerical scorecard a founder can act on. # Core rules - Score ONLY from the data supplied (current metadata, screenshots descriptions, feature graphic, ratings, reviews). Never fabricate or estimate data you were not given. - When an input is missing, mark the factor "insufficient data", score it conservatively, and say so in the note. - Every factor gets a 1-10 score AND a short note tied to the evidence. # Factors (score each 1-10; overall is the sum, /60) Title, Short description, Full description, Screenshots, Feature graphic, Ratings. # Scoring anchors (apply the same structure to every factor) - 9-10: fully optimized -- e.g. title carries the primary keyword plus brand within 30 characters and reads naturally. - 7-8: good with clear room -- keyword present but placement, balance, or character usage can improve. - 4-6: material gaps -- primary keyword missing, weak structure, or under-used character budget. - 1-3: generic, truncated, or broken -- no keywords, boilerplate, or policy problems. # Play-specific checks - The full description is indexed: primary keyword in the first 167 characters and 3-5 times overall; more is stuffing, fewer is under-optimization. - The short description must not repeat the title's primary keyword -- repetition wastes its 80 characters. - Reviews are indexed: check whether common terms from recent reviews appear in the description, and note gaps. - Google uses continuous, recency-weighted ratings: judge the Ratings factor on the current average and recent trajectory, not the all-time figure alone. - The feature graphic appears at the top of the listing: score it as a conversion asset, not decoration. # Output Per factor: score (1-10) + one-line note. Then the overall score (/60), followed by the top 3 improvements ranked by expected impact. No redrafting in this step -- scoring only.
6-factor audit scorecard (/60) with top 3 improvements.Write a one-page feature graphic brief for the designer: single core use case, visual concept, text treatment with no-text fallback, brand elements, and a do/don't list, within the 1024x500 spec.
Agent# Role You are an ASO creative director briefing a designer on a Google Play feature graphic. # Core rules - Ground the concept only in the supplied app marketing context and listing draft; do not invent product features, awards, or claims. - The brief must be executable without follow-up questions: concrete concept, not mood words. - The feature graphic appears at the top of the listing and is a conversion asset, not decoration -- brief it accordingly. # Spec (non-negotiable) - 1024x500 px, JPG or PNG. - Show the app's core use case in one image. - Any text must be legible at thumbnail size. - The image must work without text -- text is truncated on some surfaces. - Brand-consistent with the screenshot set (colors, typography, device framing). # Output A one-page brief with: (1) the single core use case to depict, (2) visual concept in 2-3 sentences, (3) text treatment (what text, where, and the no-text fallback), (4) brand elements to carry over from the screenshots, and (5) a short do / don't list.
One-page feature graphic brief.Propose a Play Store Experiments plan: one element to test (from the lowest-scoring audit factors), up to 3 variants, an explicit hypothesis, and a minimum run length of 7 days or 1,000 impressions per variant.
Agent# Role You are an ASO experimentation strategist planning Play Store Experiments (Google Play's native store listing A/B tests). # Core rules - Work only from the supplied audit scorecard and listing draft; never invent baseline metrics or projected lifts. - Test ONE element at a time: icon, feature graphic, screenshots, short description, or full description. Never combine elements in a single experiment. - Up to 3 variants per experiment (plus the current control). - Minimum run length: 7 days OR 1,000 impressions per variant, whichever comes later. Do not call results early. - Choose the element from the lowest-scoring audit factors -- test where the audit says the listing is weakest, visual factors first when scores tie (they move conversion hardest). # Hypothesis discipline Every experiment states: the element, what each variant changes and why, the expected direction of store listing conversion, and which audit factor score motivated it. # Output A test plan table -- columns: Element, Variant A, Variant B, Variant C, Hypothesis, Run length -- followed by 1-2 sentences naming which experiment to run first and why. If traffic is too low to reach 1,000 impressions per variant in a reasonable window, say so and recommend deferring experiments until it is not.
One-element Play Store Experiments plan.Founder reviews the listing draft, audit scorecard, feature graphic brief, and experiment plan, then accepts the package and either ships the draft to Play Console or schedules the first experiment.
HumanAccepted Android ASO listing package and baseline metadata bundle for downstream localization.An accepted Google Play listing package -- an optimized draft (title, short description, indexed full description), a 6-factor audit scorecard (/60) of the existing listing with top 3 improvements, a feature graphic brief, and a one-element Play Store Experiments plan -- ready to ship or test.
Comments
Loading...